![]() |
|||
![]() |
|
||
|
|||
Living ThingsCarte grise à Roy ArdenGeneviève Cadieux (Montreal), Olga Chagaoutdinova (Montreal), Moyra Davey (New York), Anthony Hernandez (Los Angeles), Jochen Lempert (Hamburg), Stephen Waddell (Vancouver), Jeff Wall (Vancouver), Wols (Paris) et Roy Arden (Vancouver) Opening on Saturday May 22 at 4 p.m.
|
|
Each year, Dazibao invites an artist to curate an exhibition entitled Carte grise. Drawing freely from the work of nine artists, Roy Arden has assembled a collection of studies of things. They show various living organisms that sustain Arden’s reflection upon the notion of description, for which photography would be a privileged vehicle. Living Things is an exhibition of photographs of plant and animal organisms that I have chosen from the very different oeuvres of a group of artists I admire. My purpose is not to illustrate a theme, but to ask aloud a question I have lately been asking myself; what does it mean to depict the natural world today? One of the very first tasks of depiction was to create images of human, plant and animal. Despite all of the recent avant-gardes and other larger revolutions in art, naturalistic depiction seems an almost eternal constant. When as a teenager I first saw Dürer's The Great Piece of Turf I was shocked by it's "nowness" as I had come to expect all old pictures to seem distant. Most of the works here differ little from The Great Piece of Turf of 1503 in their naturalism and even some Ancient Greek or earlier examples share essentially the same characteristics. While depictions of living things have been made for many different reasons, from the totemic to the sacred and scientific, all of the artists here make autonomous art. In the present epoch it could be argued that this autonomy is the same as an expression of bourgeois consciousness. Among these artists, Jochen Lempert, a trained biologist, is perhaps the only one who even possesses any specialised knowledge of his subjects - yet he, as much as the rest is engaged in a purely poetic project - regardless of his quasi-scientific methodology. All of the images here are seen within the normal range of human vision as it can be mimicked by cameras. I have purposely forgone the microscopic lens so that while Moyra Davey’s photos of dust or Anthony Hernandez' picture of algae might suggest the presence of micro-organisms, they are not identifiable as individual beings. I hope that my picture Solar displays the violence inherent to appearance, as the light that makes something visible is at once nourishing to the organism, but also corrosive. I learned this first from looking at the photos of Wols. I have included subjects living and dead in order to ask what changes when a life ends - and when exactly does a life end? In Wols' photo of a dead rabbit it is obviously no longer alive but it is still a rabbit - so when does the rabbit cease to exist? When the heart stops? When every last molecule is separated? In Jeff Wall's Clipped Branches we see a living thing that has parts of it removed. We invent ideal or normative forms from our experience of the particular but it would seem that things can survive in less than ideal form. Olga Chagaoutdinova's picture of her family and Genevieve Cadieux's photo Hand both register the emotional expressivity of the face and body while Stephen Waddell's depiction of a woman made from behind denies facial expressivity - what can we know about the inside from the outside This exhibition is not motivated by any extraordinary appreciation of nature. It's not that I love nature particularly - but more because I enjoy looking. Perhaps living things are generally more interesting to look at than minerals or man-made things because they have an inner life. Roy Arden |